words, crafted to represent information, so one can track information via people who are exposed to it. Sounds like fun!
example: the term E.B.E. which, upon mine usage even here on such a giant wall upon which thousands scrawl we call Blogger will be found (eventually, if not upon publishing.) Even heard of it? i didn't before a year or two ago, but it supposedly been in usage by secret government alien agenda. (See: smoke, mirrors, hamster wheels, and disinformation.) Like a pigeon being tagged so you can see where it's been. That pigeon can be seen by anyone looking for pigeons and thats all that matters.
The languages you speak are fabricated, so people who care about the dispersal patterns of information can track otherwise invisible ideas (assuming said intelligence operatives can't already read your mind, lol). Ya follow? Intelligence, as its so flamboyantly downplaywardly called nowadays, otherwise known as information, has been mankind's longest and most useful resource.
Its funny because not only is it capable of being infinitely available (though not without decay or corruption, otherwise known as transformation or change) is actively kept finite with the keeping of secrets. Not to say that its not ok to have secrets, only the idea that one can own an idea is ludicrous. People rediscover thoughts, either by piecing it together from component parts for themselves or recieving an idea as a whole from another communication. Information is good for the whole of humanity, there's no reason to keep what is KNOWN away from other people.
You can keep your plans to yourself if you want, i'm sure thats perogative and hey, even I like surprises, so if you're planning a surprise party or attack then whatever. But there are different kinds of surprises. Humanity is a whole, though made of individuals, we are singles like cells in a whole like a body. What is good for the whole is good for everyone. A single can't ever be greater than the whole. I am completely unaware if one of the cells on the skin of my arm is wicked, i mean totally amazing compared to all the other skin cells. it won't ever be better than my whole body. That isn't to say individuals can't or don't do great things; individuals are usually the forebears, point-men and sources of great actions. That is to say that being selfish to the point of denying or hurting others does not actually do anything for yourself, because they are a part of the same whole as yourself and what you do to them you are also doing to yourself. Like killing people so other people can live. One could say its like eating a cake so other cakes don't have to be eaten. what the fuck, right?
So back to information tracking. people make up new words and acronyms and letter sequences, like E.B.E, because with the sea of people we have nowadays, things become dilute and hard to trace. "Alien" just turns up too many advertisements for nevada, immigration issues, and party apparel for it to be of any use to those who follow people that are interested in aliens!
And UFOlogy is a good way to get on to the next part: grouping and organization. Ideas are just like anything else, they are part of some kind of recognizeable group, move with like and attract similar ideas. Aliens, UFO's, crop circles, and that goes right into conspiracy and thats all a field major players are interested in. The actual validity, that is amount of truth and fact, is absolutely unimportant. There probably are tons of cases where people can't identify what is they're looking at. It doesn't matter what they were looking at to the people watching those sky-watchers; its how they react to it that information trackers are interested in.
Man in Black A invents a word that gets tagged to the idea of "person from anywhere but earth" and watches it move through an already well-known community where that idea is prominently found. Anyone who uses his newly invented word is revealing of themselves their own recent acclimation to the idea, and thus their close proximity to the "cusp" of change, that is new incoming information, in their community. The same would go for "teh candy, i brings it" or "i can has cheesburger?" or anything. Any word you can think of is a tag on an idea, and when you can follow ideas as tracks, flowpatterns, through the populace, you become aware of just how intricate our social networking interaction as a human whole is.
There are tons of people, more people now than ever before (just like every OTHER time in history anybody ever said that) and that means people-study should be first and foremost on the human to-do list. Just how much DO you know about humans, what they do and what they are capable of? There are billions of people, and some people have taken the knowledge that we are seperate from eachother enough to be manipulated by other people too far. I'm all for becoming a better organized human whole, but not until those who say they are helping the organizing stop siphoning off the majority for themselves.
Example: Money. Its a ridiculous idea. The general social useage of a universal coupon-note thats good for anything but itself, and not of any use in and of itself is some kind of oxymoron. I mean, money has no value in and of itself. It is simply a marker, a time marker if you will, of value from the future. The object you are going to trade your money for later contains all the actual usefulness and thus value. Money represents past value when you get it for something. Therefore money has NO PRESENT VALUE. EVER. It is a debtor's note from someone with a lot of nothing but a tap on the future. He's the man in front of you in line at the train station, closer the unloading dock then you and his money is a promise that he'll get you something off that train. Maybe he'll break off a piece for himself while he's at it.
Dissemination of resources (supply) is what is important. By injecting the trading pool with artificial value, you can thus SLOW the actual useage of real-time present moment resources, but are forced to leech future resources to do so. But since nobody lives in the "future" and all you have are plans and promises for said "Future" resources, all that actually happens is those present-moment people just hoard the present-moment resources, and demand services in exchange.
Money was never used as some good idea or well intended purpose. It might be sold to you as a replacement for barter by balancing the value between service and good, but it doesn't actually do anything good at all. Its just a promise. And nowadays, the people who sell you their money are allowed to base the value on more of their promises.
So we have people that are good at studying and following the activities, ideas, and processes of other people! But then there are people who use all that info for the detriment of mankind.
The idea of ownership still boggles my mind. Its infectious, like pride and prejudice (lol). Telling someone they are better than everyone else is a complete fallacy and only makes that person horrible with other people. Infectious, detrimental thinking. Telling someone they own something is just as bad! All of a sudden you have a 5 year old screaming "mine, mine, mine!!" wtf?
If we were taught from childhood that we didn't own things, that we WERE things instead, people would have a much more accurate perception of how the world works. You raise someone by seeding the idea they own things, and then you can get them to work for more stuff they want to own later. You tell someone that what they need exists when they find a need for it, and you what? possibly slow down production speed?
It seems we keep everybody working because it occupies their time more than actually getting anything done. And all the glorified organizers get to siphon off of other people's work without actually doing anything themselves. The ideas and operations are lauded and kept vague when people are totally capable of organizing themselves of their own accord.
People can get all the same things done they are doing today, but the dissemination of "wealth" and resources needs to match the workload. Every group of workers, no matter what they are doing or how large the group, needs to share equally amongst its members. WHY the FUCK do people let one person "own" a pizza shop, make all the profit, and be allowed to pay a, what the fuck, a legal minimum? A LEGAL MINIMUM?!?! why do we have a system that works with MINIMUMS?!? No that stupid old fuck who owns the pizza shop doesn't get to make money off my sweat!! all 7 employees should be splitting the profits equally.
I personally don't like the idea of profit, artificially assigning value again, its really just stealing. Take a 2$ pizza and calling it 20$ doesn't make it worth 18$ tastier, worthier, or even better. Its just stealing. But we can't take all the steps in one giant leap, i don't think. So at first we just organize ourselves into groups of Aware members; that is everyone knows what the income, assets, and costs of their groups business/work. Then when you have everyone organized in groups, you can just get rid of the money and organize the demands of supply according to the rate of resupply.
People seem to always forget about exponential factors in functions. Food is grown at a rate that changes, and can be disseminated according to the rate of that growth to where its needed. Basing how much food to send say a pizza shop based on how much that pizza shop used last time is about the most backwards, stupid ass way to do that. You send them food based on how much food you have and THEN their requests for resupply.
The stupidity inherent in asking for more than you need is JUST as bad as being the hoarding asshole who doesn't want to share at all. Sharing is a foreign idea because its defined based on another made up idea called Ownership. We don't own the food we grow on this planet. There is NO reason to hoard supply! Just like information!! Why do we let other people hoard resources? Why do people feel the need to hoard in the first place?
Chicken or egg? at this point it doesnt matter; if you head off the teaching of the idea of ownership in the first place, childhood, then you don't have to deal with childish adults who think they have to hoard things. All resources are for everyone alive, and that means that everybody "owns" everything, that is everybody would be considered "rich" as you think about those terms now. Every individual would be as rich as the Whole community is. Everybody just needs more organized access to resources.
There are so many people that I don't think its smart to wait for people who are stupid enough to over-indulge, and excessively consume until they eat themselves to death. Its like leaving a wound untreated and taking the slow way out. Its better to just teach humans to be smart about their consumage, teach people how to act in BALANCE with our environment, instead of being dumb and inconsiderate. Just like how we treat others is how we are treating ourselves same goes for our environment. You eat everything today then you'll be hungry tommorow.
I think greed is more taught than any kind of natural tendency. And like any other system, this one will work once it gets up to speed; carried by its own momentum enough to keep from being upset by counter-activity. I mean, its human nature for some to go against the flow, you just have to be aware of that and plan for it. Organization!
People will sort out their own morals and everything else if you just keep them organized. bugger all this drudgery we put up with so far, banks are a cancer to humanity, they represent everything that is wrong with society. Greed, hoarding, taxing, sapping, something for nothing black-hole oblivionation of humanity.
...
i'd have made a great videogame developer, i wonder what i would be like if i went to college and careered myself into ignorant anonymity amongst the populace. who cares? ridiculous line of thought.
i probably still COULD go work for a videogame company, i mean, i still love them. I'm smart and creative as fuck. maybe later. Extending my life and science are still more important to me as videogames. ok maybe AS important, lol. like eating and pooping are too.
i should go!
Tuesday, December 16, 2008
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment